Filter by Categories
So Long, Western Alliance?
'WorldWatch' by Richard T. RitenbaughThe 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) released by the Trump administration sharply criticizes Europe for deficiencies in national defense, among other issues, which contribute to the prospect of civilizational erasure within 20 years if current trends persist. The document questions whether certain European countries will maintain economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies. It highlights slashed military budgets as one of the unwise policy decisions over the past half-century that have led Europe toward a crisis point, necessitating swift, emergency actions to avoid collapse. The NSS aims to help Europe correct its trajectory, emphasizing the need for a strong Europe to compete successfully and prevent any adversary from dominating the continent. However, it warns that the long-term demographic and cultural transformation due to unchecked immigration may result in certain NATO members becoming majority non-European within a few decades, raising doubts about whether they will view their alliance with the United States in the same way as the original signatories of the NATO charter. The strategy simultaneously seeks to warn and encourage Europe to address these defense and alliance issues to maintain peace and prosperity for both American and European interests.
Slowly Sinking
'WorldWatch' by Joseph B. BaityThe United States, once deemed a regional power before World War II, emerged as the most powerful and technologically advanced military force in history after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, American leaders proclaimed the U.S. as an indispensable nation, with expectations to lead global democratization. However, three decades of mismanagement have led to significant cracks in the nation's military armor. According to Dakota Wood of The Heritage Foundation, the active-duty Army has decreased from 770,000 soldiers at the end of the Cold War to less than 480,000 today, and the Navy's fleet has shrunk from nearly 600 ships to 290, most of which are outdated. Military spending as a percentage of the federal budget has also dropped to historic lows, from 25% to 15%. Maintenance challenges plague expensive military hardware like fighter jets and tanks, exacerbated by supply-chain issues and political conflicts with China, a primary source of replacement parts. Recruitment shortfalls further weaken the forces, with a 30% deficit in 2022 goals and only 23% of young Americans eligible to serve due to rising obesity and other health issues. Academic declines during the pandemic have also led to fewer potential recruits passing vocational aptitude tests. American military leadership's focus on LGBT-driven agendas, including funding gender-transition therapies and mandating sensitivity training, raises concerns about combat readiness over troop unity. Additionally, political and military leaders increasingly view climate change as the greatest security threat, overshadowing concerns about nations like China or Russia. In 2021, President Biden reiterated the military's stance that global warming poses the greatest physical threat to America, a view supported by top defense officials. Recent warnings highlight the fading power of America's military deterrent, as evidenced by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Navy Admiral Charles Richard, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, cautioned that the current crisis is merely a warmup for a larger conflict, stating that the nation's deterrence against China is slowly sinking due to their rapid capability advancements outpacing American efforts. As the U.S. navigates an uncertain future, its once-vaunted military machine appears less prepared to deter aggression, potentially forcing concessions to Eastern powers.
Yet Another Call for a European Army
Commentary by Richard T. RitenbaughFor over seven decades since the end of World War II, the anticipation of a united Europe under a powerful military leader, often referred to as the Beast or the King of the North, has been a focal point of prophetic discussion. The Bible, particularly in Daniel 11:40, portrays this figure as commanding overwhelming military might, with chariots, horsemen, and many ships, to dominate nations and pass through countries with force. This imagery underscores the expectation of a formidable military power emerging from Europe. Recent calls for a European army, led by figures like French President Emmanuel Macron, reflect ongoing desires for military independence from alliances like NATO and the United States, which some European leaders view as unreliable. However, the European Union, comprising 27 member states, struggles with internal disagreements over the formation of such a force. Many nations are reluctant to allocate the necessary funds, often prioritizing social programs over defense spending, and some prefer the security of NATO's presence over a standalone European military. Current European military capabilities, especially in powerhouse nations like Germany, reveal significant weaknesses. Germany, despite being the largest economy in the EU, spends only a fraction of its GDP on defense, with reports highlighting critical shortages in equipment, readiness, and recruitment. Other European nations face similar challenges, rendering the collective military strength insufficient for significant action. Only a few countries, like Poland and Belgium, show commitment to integrated defense through NATO. The persistent inability to form a robust military force raises questions about the timeline and location of the prophesied rise of the King of the North. Despite repeated European aspirations for a unified army, the reality remains a limited Rapid Reaction Force, far from the mighty power described in prophecy. This ongoing situation highlights the uncertainty in predicting how such a military transformation will unfold, yet affirms the belief that God remains sovereign, orchestrating events in His own time to fulfill His purpose and bring about the return of Jesus Christ.
Prepare to Meet Your God! (Part Four)
Article by John W. Ritenbaugh and Richard T. RitenbaughIn the context of Israel's deep-seated corruption and rejection of God's truth, the nation faced severe consequences, including vulnerability in national defense. When the time came to defend the nation from foreign invasion, Israel would have no strength. God declares in Ezekiel 7:14 that though they have blown the trumpet and made everyone ready, no one goes to battle. The people's preoccupation with self-interests prevented them from responding to external threats, leading to the nation's easy fall. Tumult, oppression, violence, and robbery within the nation begot weakness and destruction. As Israel's moral fiber weakened, its fighting spirit drained, and the nation could no longer present a united front. With military strength exploited and thinned by deployments worldwide, and amidst moral and social malaise, the people found it increasingly difficult to rouse themselves to action as a nation. Behind this decline is God, who sees the corruption and warns that the time of judgment is near. Amos depicts Israel as powerless at the height of its economic, political, and military power because its religion was a sham, and immorality and unrighteousness inevitably bring ruin. God empowers the heathen as His battle-ax to punish His people, aiming ultimately to bring them to repentance.
The Time of Jacob's Trouble
Sermon by David C. GrabbeIn the context of national judgment and the progression of divine warnings, the breakdown of national defense is a significant indicator of God's response to disobedience among His people. As outlined in Leviticus 26:17, national defense begins to falter, and those who hate God's people will reign over them. This hatred is not limited by nationality, suggesting that even leaders from within the nation who harbor animosity toward their own could be instruments of God's curse. Furthermore, this verse describes a pervasive fear and paranoia that grips the nation, even in the absence of immediate threats, because God is no longer their Shield due to their own choices. Deuteronomy 28:25 reinforces this dire consequence, stating that the Lord will cause His people to be defeated before their enemies. They will go out one way against them and flee seven ways, becoming troublesome to all kingdoms of the earth. Despite human assessments of military strength and strategic advantages, God's word prevails, emphasizing that when He fights against a nation, defeat is inevitable. Historical patterns, such as in Judges 2:14-15, show God delivering His people into the hands of plunderers and enemies when His anger is aroused by their rebellion, rendering them unable to stand before their adversaries. This theme of divine intervention against a rebellious nation is further illustrated in Deuteronomy 32:30, where it is asked how one could chase a thousand or two put ten thousand to flight unless their Rock had sold them and the Lord had surrendered them. This underscores that no amount of military might or expenditure can counter God's judgment when a nation turns from Him. The true measure of a nation's security lies in its alignment with God's will, not in human metrics of power or defense capabilities.
Cruising for Trouble
CGG Weekly by Charles WhitakerThe US utterly lacks an effective cruise missile defense plan. Defending against cruise missiles has probably become the most challenging air defense problem.