Filter by Categories
Searching for Israel (Part Six): Israel Is Fallen, Is Fallen
Article by Charles WhitakerThe children of Israel divided into two kingdoms after Jeroboam led a tax revolt against Rehoboam. Judah, Benjamin, and Levi remained under the Davidic monarchy in the south, while the remaining ten tribes formed the northern Kingdom of Israel. Jeroboam instituted religious changes that became a sin for the house of Israel, building shrines at Bethel and Dan with golden calves, altering the fall festival from the seventh month to the eighth, and appointing non-Levite priests. The Levites migrated south, and the northern priesthood became filled with people from other classes. Subsequent kings of Israel never departed from Jeroboam's apostasy. The children of Israel walked in all the sins of Jeroboam and did not depart from them, engaging in widespread idolatry, pagan religious practices such as causing their sons and daughters to pass through the fire, and rejection of God's statutes and covenant. Social injustice also became epidemic, with the righteous sold for silver and the poor oppressed. As a result, the Lord grew angry with Israel and removed them from His sight. The king of Assyria besieged Samaria for three years, took the city, and carried Israel away to Assyria, placing the people in Halah, by the Habor, the River of Gozan, and the cities of the Medes. About 250 years after its establishment, the ten-tribed northern kingdom became extinct as a sovereign nation. The Kingdom of Judah witnessed Israel's fall but followed the same course of idolatry and harlotry, defiling the land. God therefore determined to remove Judah from His sight as He had removed Israel. Nebuchadnezzar carried the people of Judah to Babylon in waves between 604 and 585 BC, destroying Jerusalem and the Temple. As national entities, both Israel and Judah became extinct, their peoples subject to Gentile rulers as punishment for inveterate apostasy. This double fall fulfilled the conditional promise of punishment outlined in Leviticus 26 for failure to obey God's commandments, yet it did not mean God reneged on His promises to the patriarchs or rendered meaningless the blessings bestowed on their sons.
The Doctrine of Israel (Part Six): New Testament Teaching
Sermon by Richard T. RitenbaughThose who follow Christ are the true Israel, the Elect, and the Chosen, called by God to precede unfaithful physical Israel in the salvation process.
Are We Already In Captivity?
Sermon by John W. Ritenbaugh (1932-2023)Major curses, including economic oppression, famine, pestilence, mental illness, alien invasion, the scattering of modern Israel are yet to occur.
The Canaanite Woman's Faith
Sermon by Richard T. RitenbaughThe account of the Canaanite woman in Matthew 15:21-28 and Mark 7:24-30 centers on Jesus' declaration that He "was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel," a statement that forms the structural and theological core of the passage. This principle explains why Jesus initially remained silent toward the woman's plea and why He later described the priority as giving "bread" to "the children" before it could go to the "little dogs." The children here represent Israel, God's own people, while the bread symbolizes Jesus Himself, the "bread of life," along with His time, attention, teaching, and healing power. His words were not a slur against Gentiles but a statement of proper sequence: in an ordered household, children are fed before pets, regardless of how beloved or useful those pets may be. This reflects God's consistent pattern of working through stages, beginning with one nation before expanding further. From the time of Israel's bondage in Egypt through the rest of the Old Testament, God worked exclusively with Israel. In the New Testament, this same pattern held: Jesus' earthly ministry was directed to Israel first, with outreach to Gentiles delayed until after the resurrection, at the proper appointed time. This is confirmed by His earlier commission to the Twelve in Matthew 10:5-8, where He explicitly instructed them, "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Thus, the Canaanite woman's request, though sincere and urgent, came before the appointed time for Gentile inclusion; in that sense, she was, so to speak, out of order, asking for something not yet extended to her people. Matthew reinforces this contrast by identifying the woman specifically as a "woman of Canaan," deliberately invoking the ancient opposition between Israel and the Canaanites whom Israel had displaced from the land. This detail heightens the irony of the scene: while contentious, unbelieving Jews had just confronted Jesus over His teaching, this Gentile woman descended from Israel's ancient enemies displayed extraordinary humility, worship, and faith, addressing Him as "Lord" and "Son of David," a messianic title tied to Israel's own royal lineage. Her response to the "children and dogs" metaphor demonstrated that she understood and accepted this divine order without offense. She acknowledged that the "children," God's covenant people, rightly ate first, yet appealed to the fact that even household dogs receive the crumbs that fall from the table. This showed both humility and faith, and Jesus praised her accordingly, declaring "great is your faith," a commendation He extended only to her and to the Gentile centurion of Capernaum, not to anyone within Israel itself. Ultimately, this episode illustrates that Israel's priority in God's redemptive plan did not represent favoritism or prejudice but reflected the deliberate, orderly unfolding of God's purpose, first to the children of Israel, and afterward, in due time, to the nations, a pattern to be trusted rather than resisted or misread as inequality.