Filter by Categories
Marxism in Academia: The Origins of Political Correctness
Commentary by David F. MaasAfter the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990, American Academia became the new home for a virulent strain of Marxism, deadlier than any virus. According to Dr. Sebastian Gorka, the key figures behind this infiltration were Herbert Marcuse, known as the Father of the New Left from the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, and Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals. Marcuse introduced a pragmatic form of Marxism, while Alinsky, described as the first modern community organizer, transformed these ideas into actionable strategies for societal disruption. Their influence began in universities such as Princeton, Columbia, Brandeis, and the University of Chicago, spreading destructive ideologies. Andrew Breitbart portrays Marcuse as the ideological leader of the New Left and Alinsky as the practical enforcer, simplifying and spreading Marcuse's message to make it a guiding force in American society. Marcuse, unable to find a traditional proletariat, exploited new dividing lines through victim groups, fueling identity politics by emphasizing tensions between genders, races, and sexual orientations. He aimed to dismantle American society using diversity and multiculturalism as tools to fracture its structures. Marcuse and Alinsky weaponized these tensions, promoting partisan tolerance to silence critics and shut down debate, a concept that has evolved into today's political correctness. Dr. Gorka highlights how Marcuse's ideas and Alinsky's tactics have led to significant societal shifts, including the weakening of the nuclear family, especially in certain communities, and the redefinition of traditional values. Their influence is evident in the suppression of conservative voices on college campuses, the celebration of anti-Semitic movements, and the enforcement of rigid identity norms online. Through their strategies, Academia has become a battleground for ideas that pit Americans against each other based on race, gender, and personal identity, fundamentally challenging the fabric of society.
Mightier Than the Sword (Part Nine)
Commentary by John W. Ritenbaugh (1932-2023)Rousseau's and Robespierre's philosophies encouraged abortion, the destruction of the family, and the ascendancy of the state.
Safe Spaces or Dangerous Places? The Assault Upon Our Future (Part One)
'WorldWatch' by Joseph B. BaityThe terms 'safe spaces' and 'trigger warning' have cropped up frequently in the past year or so in the media. Here is what they mean and portend.
Liberal Haters of God
CGG Weekly by Charles WhitakerTo secularists, faith in the unseen God is incomprehensible and irrational. They view it as divisive to the coherence of society, as well as destructive.
Mightier Than The Sword (Part Seventeen)
Commentary by John W. Ritenbaugh (1932-2023)Legions of 'progressive' humanist academics of American and European universities have proclaimed Marx the most influential voice of the last millennium.
Today's Brand of Tolerance
Commentary by John W. Ritenbaugh (1932-2023)'Tolerance,' as used by progressives, does not reflect real tolerance at all, but instead an adamant hatred of anything associated with God and His words.
Your Mouth is About to Get You in Trouble
Commentary by Martin G. CollinsLeftist attorneys have elevated animal rights over human rights, attempting to 'give back' to animals the rights that human beings have 'taken' from them.
A Characterization of a None
Commentary by John W. Ritenbaugh (1932-2023)The motion picture, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, portrays mind-control by a narcissistic teacher who molds her students into her hypocritical, amoral mindset.
Can Theology Define God's Nature?
Article by Earl L. HennHuman reason and logic are practically useless as tools in determining the nature of God. Only the Bible gives a complete revelation of God.
Does Doctrine Really Matter? (Part Three)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughThroughout the 'Christian' world, militant atheism may be decreasing, but religious indifference is also increasing at even a more dramatic rate.
Suppressed Archaeology (Part One)
Commentary by Martin G. CollinsSeveral groups have questioned the bias of the Smithsonian Institute for suppressing records of pre-Columbus exploration and inhabiting of North America.