Filter by Categories
Beware the Second Flood (Part Two)
CGG Weekly by David C. GrabbeIn Jesus' parable, building on sand represents a foundation that cannot withstand the flood of life's trials and difficult circumstances. Those who hear Christ's sayings and act on them build a secure foundation, able to weather the onslaught. However, if the flood of information inspired by the serpent drowns out God's truth, our spiritual walk with Him will suffer, and we will be overwhelmed by the challenges of this age. The solution lies in cultivating a deep love for the truth, which is the spiritual reality of the Most High God and His firstborn Son, including Their purpose, will, and governance over our lives. By pursuing and protecting this truth, we ensure that the deceptive flood will not sweep away our unique standing before God.
Foundations of Sand
Sermon by Richard T. RitenbaughBuilding on sand versus building on rock forms the central image drawn from Jesus' parable in Matthew 7:24-27 and its parallel in Luke 6:46-49, illustrating the choice every convert faces between an enduring foundation and a foundation certain to fail. In Matthew's Greek, rock is petra, a massive, immovable crag like the Rock of Gibraltar, unitary and everlasting, representing Christ Himself, called the Rock throughout Scripture, including 1 Corinthians 10:4, Deuteronomy 32, and Psalm 18. Sand, by contrast, is ammos, tiny, shifting, transient grains easily washed or blown away, symbolizing instability and spiritual ruin. Every converted person, despite claiming stability, actually carries considerable sand within their foundation, often disguised as godliness through self-deception, neglect, weariness, or misplaced comfort, until a crisis exposes what was truly sand all along. Luke's version sharpens this warning in four key ways. First, it merges the condemnation of disobedience with the foundation parable, showing that failing to do what Christ says is precisely why people build on sand rather than rock; obedience to His commands is the only path to lasting construction, a truth echoed in Deuteronomy 5 and 6, where Israel's blessing or destruction hinged on hearing and doing. Second, Luke's wise builder "digs deep" to reach rock beneath deceptively solid-looking hardpan, an image of the strenuous, painful effort required to remove sin, wrong thinking, and old habits, paralleling the removal of leaven, putting off the old man, and Paul's counsel in Ephesians 4:17-24 to abandon the futility, uncleanness, and corruption of the former Gentile walk. Third, Luke specifies the crisis as a flood, plemmyra, a violent, overflowing torrent recalling Noah, who by faith and obedience built an ark and endured, in contrast to those swept away; this flood imagery also connects to Satan's deluge of deceptive words meant to draw believers into apostasy, warned against in Revelation 12:15-16. Fourth, Luke says the foolish builder constructs directly on the earth, ge, without any foundation, rather than explicitly on sand, drawing a heaven-versus-earth contrast: heaven is God's perfect, spiritual realm, while earth is Satan's corrupt, sensual domain, a distinction reinforced in Revelation 13 and 19 and in the coming dissolution of the physical creation described in 2 Peter 3:10-13. Ultimately, sand represents any earthly attachment competing with total loyalty to Christ, whether patriotism, political ideology, materialism, tribal identity, or diversion, and identifying and removing it through sacrifice, diligence, and covenant faithfulness, as described in Romans 12:1-2 and Colossians 1:9-23, is essential preparation for enduring the coming flood and remaining firmly anchored to the Rock.
Four Warnings (Part Four): Founded on the Rock
Sermon by Richard T. RitenbaughThe concluding parable of the Sermon on the Mount, found in Matthew 7:24-29, presents the choice between building a house on rock versus building on sand as Christ's final and most crucial warning to His disciples. This parable functions as the culmination of four warnings that spiral from broad principles down to a sharp, personal point, and it addresses not the initial choice to follow Christ, but the daily, ongoing struggle of remaining founded on Him throughout the entirety of Christian life. The house built on sand represents the person who hears Christ's words but does not practice them consistently, ultimately resulting in ruin and, by implication, the second death. Jesus calls this person moros—foolish, senseless, mentally deficient—because choosing an unstable, shifting foundation over a solid one is an act of self-destructive irrationality. Sand itself is defined by its qualities: it is tiny, loose, multitudinous, and transient, standing in stark contrast to rock, which is massive, unified, fixed, and enduring. These qualities symbolize the countless small, shifting philosophies, worldly ideas, and inconsistent beliefs that compete with Christ for a disciple's loyalty. The core danger illustrated by building on sand is human inconsistency—being firmly grounded in Christ regarding some convictions while allowing worldly or contradictory ideas to remain mixed into one's foundation elsewhere. This inconsistency is compared to the Israelites in the wilderness, who, despite passing through the sea and receiving spiritual sustenance, later succumbed to lust, idolatry, immorality, and complaining, leading to their destruction. Paul's admonition that "he who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall" reinforces that an initial commitment to Christ does not guarantee ongoing stability; believers must continually examine themselves to detect where sand remains mixed into their foundation. The writer of Hebrews similarly warns against drifting away through neglect, while also offering hope that those who have begun to grow dull can return to their first diligence and be restored. The Corinthian church exemplifies this problem, having imported worldly philosophies—Judaizing tendencies, Gnostic ideas, hedonism, and asceticism—into their fellowship, attempting to blend these with the pure Word of God. Paul's rebuke that there can be no communion between righteousness and lawlessness, light and darkness, or Christ and Belial establishes that God's revelation cannot be synchronized with worldly ideas without producing division, chaos, and ultimately destruction. Luke 14 expands this same principle into four specific ways a disciple may abandon the rock-solid foundation: prioritizing human relationships over Christ, refusing to bear one's cross, failing to endure to completion, or surrendering to opposition. Ultimately, this warning about sand is not merely a repeat of the earlier caution against empty profession without obedience; it addresses the subtler, ongoing temptation to tolerate impure, worldly elements within an otherwise sincere Christian walk. The remedy is continual self-examination and the deliberate, lifelong work of clearing away every grain of sand—every competing philosophy or inconsistency—so that one's entire life rests solely and securely upon Christ, the one unshifting and enduring foundation capable of withstanding every storm.
The Solid Foundation of God
Sermonette by Richard T. RitenbaughWe don't all build on the foundation in the same manner, but God will test the quality of work for each of us in order to see if our edifice will stand.
Foundations
Feast of Tabernacles Sermon by John O. ReidThe pillars of the Parthenon were fitted together in sections. It is impossible for these pillars to stand without a solid foundation.