Filter by Categories
Circumcision Is Nothing?
Sermonette by Charles Whitaker (1944-2021)While the Jerusalem Council did rule that Gentiles were not obligated to be physically circumcised, the ruling did not extend to Israelites.
Lessons from New Zealand Circumcisions
Commentary by Charles Whitaker (1944-2021)In the context of God's covenant with Abraham, as outlined in Genesis 17:4-14, circumcision is established as a significant sign of the Abrahamic Covenant. God specifies in verse 12 that it should occur on the eighth day after birth, and in verse 14, He emphasizes its importance by stating that an uncircumcised Israelite shall be cut off from his people for breaking His covenant. While ideally performed on the eighth day, circumcision can occur later, as seen with Abraham himself at 99 years old and others in Scripture who were circumcised after this time, yet always in recognition of the covenant. Beyond this covenantal practice, other forms of circumcision exist as shadows of the one God ordained. Neonatal circumcisions, medical circumcisions, and rite-of-passage circumcisions associated with puberty, practiced by groups such as Muslims, Tongans, and Samoans, are performed without connection to the Abrahamic Covenant, merely reflecting its form. Historically, in New Zealand, neonatal circumcision, generally unrelated to the Abrahamic Covenant, peaked in 1945 with about 950 out of every 1,000 boys circumcised, largely influenced by religious beliefs of the time that linked circumcision to preventing moral failings. This led to high rates in the early 1900s, with Catholic hospitals mandating it as part of maternity policy until secularization in the 1960s. However, as New Zealand's leadership became more secular post-World War II, the government, leveraging its control over a socialized medical system, reversed policies without public input, defunding neonatal circumcision. By 1995, the rate plummeted to only 3 out of 1,000 boys, reflecting a significant shift driven by a secular bureaucracy using state power to alter long-standing practices.
Neonatal Circumcision in America
Commentary by Charles Whitaker (1944-2021)In the United States, the prevalence of circumcision among males of all ages stands at about 75%, notably higher than other Israelite nations such as Canada at 32%, Australia at 30%, France at 14%, Finland at 2-4%, Denmark at 1.6%, and New Zealand at 0.3%. Adjusting for non-Israelite populations who generally do not practice circumcision, such as many Asians and Latinos in California, the prevalence rate among Israelites in the US may be even higher than reported figures like California's 23%. Neonatal circumcision rates in the US have seen a dramatic decline in recent years. Studies indicate a fall in incidence from 56% in 2007 to 30% in 2009, representing a sharp decrease of 13 percentage points per year. This rapid drop raises questions about underlying causes, especially as 18 states have defunded neonatal circumcision through Medicaid since 1982, with several doing so between 2002 and 2007. Incidence rates of neonatal circumcision also vary significantly across different regions within the United States. In the Midwest, the rate averages just over 76%, the highest in the country, covering states from Missouri's southern border to the Canadian border, including Wyoming, Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas, and east to Ohio and Pennsylvania. The Northeast follows at 64.5%, encompassing areas north and east of Pennsylvania. The South records a rate of 56.3%, including Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, and states southward. The West has the lowest rate at about 30%, covering Montana, Colorado, New Mexico, and states westward, including Alaska, but excluding Wyoming. Despite high mobility among Americans, especially since World War II, regional differences in circumcision rates persist and appear to be growing rather than homogenizing over time. This regionalism in circumcision incidence prompts speculation about whether these patterns reflect deeper societal or geopolitical divisions within the nation.
The Covenant of Circumcision
Sermon/Bible Study by John W. RitenbaughCircumcision was the sign God gave Abraham indicating that his descendants would ascend to greatness, acquiring physical and spiritual blessings.
Why We Must Put Out Leaven
Article by Earl L. HennWhy must we put leaven out, yet we do not have to circumcise our baby boys? Is deleavening 'Old Covenant'?
Forms vs. Spirituality (Part 4)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughThe yoke grievous to bear (Acts 15:10) was not God's law, but an entire package of Pharisaic regulations that had been elevated to the level of God's law.
The Jerusalem Council's Conclusion
Sermon/Bible Study by Richard T. RitenbaughThe following is a concise rewrite of the sections related to 'Circumcision, Physical' from the provided material, maintaining the original tone and focusing on its relevance to the broader context. Only complete sentences are included, and non-English words or phrases are italicized using HTML tags where applicable. Circumcision, as discussed in the context of the Jerusalem council in Acts 15, was a point of contention among early believers. Certain men from Judea taught that unless Gentiles were circumcised according to the custom of Moses, they could not be saved. This led to significant disputes, prompting Paul and Barnabas to seek resolution with the apostles and elders in Jerusalem. The council addressed whether circumcision was necessary for salvation, with some Pharisees insisting that Gentiles must be circumcised and keep the law of Moses to be considered members of the faith. Peter argued that God made no distinction between Jews and Gentiles, purifying their hearts by faith and granting salvation by grace through the Lord Jesus Christ in the same manner to both. He questioned why a yoke, which neither their fathers nor they could bear, should be placed on the Gentiles. This yoke, identified as the custom of Moses, referred to the accumulated laws, rituals, and traditions of Judaism, distinct from God's law, and was seen as an unbearable burden. Circumcision held different meanings under God's law and the traditions of the elders. In God's law, as seen in Genesis 17, it was a sign of the Abrahamic covenant, indicating descent from Abraham and inclusion in God's covenant people, requiring them to walk before Him and be blameless. Under the traditions of Moses, circumcision morphed into a means of salvation, functioning as a work necessary for inclusion in God's holy nation through lawkeeping and ritual purity, rather than merely a sign. Paul's writings emphasize that circumcision, as a work, does not grant justification or salvation before God. Salvation is by grace, a gift from God, not achieved through works, ensuring that both Jew and Gentile are saved in the same way. The Jerusalem council concluded that circumcision should not be required of Gentiles for salvation, as it holds no bearing on justification under the New Covenant. James supported this, affirming that Gentiles turning to God should not be burdened beyond necessary prohibitions, recognizing their exposure to God's law through synagogue teachings.
The Covenants, Grace, and Law (Part Six)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughCircumcision is a token, sign, or seal that one was the heir of Abraham. No physical sign has the power to transfer righteousness to the doer.
The Covenants, Grace, and Law (Part Seven)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughThe New Covenant was designed by God to circumcise the heart, making it possible for God's laws to be written in our hearts and reflected in our behavior.
Hebrews: Its Background (Part Nine)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughThe Book of Hebrews is a must-read for all members of God's church who seek the key for spiritual growth through a meaningful relationship with Jesus Christ.
Abraham (Part Eight)
Sermon/Bible Study by John W. RitenbaughIf we surrender to God, allowing Him to shape character in us, He will enable us to live in hope, giving us direct access to Him, giving us a more abundant life.
Choosing the New Man (Part Two)
Article by Charles WhitakerThe spiritual new man is one who is reconciled to God and has chosen to collaborate with Him in creating a totally new mind—one just like Christ's!
The Law's Purpose and Intent
Sermon by Martin G. CollinsThe effectiveness of a law is found in its purpose and intent rather than the letter. Love and mercy constitute the spiritual fulfillment of the Law.
The Law Continues
CGG Weekly by Charles WhitakerUnmistakably, the law is not a passing fancy with God, here today, gone tomorrow. As long as there are descendants of God's people, God's law still stands.
Hebrews: Its Background (Part Ten)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughParts of God's law are not presently required, yet not 'done away." Paul took a vow that required animal sacrifice. Ezekiel 34-48 shows the sacrificial law observed.
Hebrews: Its Background (Part Six)
Sermon by John W. RitenbaughThe book of Hebrews' audience consisted of converts from Judaism, suffering estrangement from family and community, excommunicated from the temple.
God Expects a Return on His Investment (Part Five)
Feast of Tabernacles Sermon by David F. MaasThe sanctification process is slow and methodical with no dazzling pyrotechnics. Each of us are given a basic set of gifts to serve our spiritual siblings.
Hebrews (Part Ten)
Sermon/Bible Study by John W. RitenbaughEverything about the Priesthood of Christ is superior to the Levitical system, which only served as a type of the access to God that Jesus would fulfill.