The agnostic and atheist Nones, who despise Christianity, face a significant problem in establishing a foundation for logic and civic conduct regarding morality. They lack any moral standing to critique a moral law system like the 10 Commandments, as atheism cannot account for morality drawn from a source higher than the individual. Without acknowledging a divine standard, they position themselves as the ultimate standard, rendering them unable to argue against acts such as murder, genocide, rape, theft, or lying. They cannot identify the moral stature of principles like doing unto others as you would have them do unto you or loving your enemies. Since they deny the existence of God, their moral framework rests on atheistic assumptions, leaving no way to prove that any act, no matter how horrific, is absolutely wrong. In their view, morality devolves into subjective justification based on personal need, where one might deem their need greater than a victim's life, sexual purity, or property. This absence of an absolute standard leads to a dangerous direction for the nation, where morality becomes a matter of counting votes. Consequently, practices such as homosexuality, lesbianism, and same-sex unions gain acceptance as moral standards simply due to majority support. The Nones, though not organized as a political party, wield significant influence through their sizable population, pushing an immoral agenda aligned with modern liberalism. Their self-concern prevents them from showing compassion for others, forcing those with upright standards to either conform, resist and face legal consequences, or abandon their principles. This reflects the perilous times foretold, where men become lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, and unholy.

A troubling trend has emerged in American courts, where matters of conscience rooted in God's law are consistently defeated. This shift began decades ago when challenges to school prayers and daily Bible readings succeeded, forcing their removal from public schools. Anti-God and anti-Bible organizations, promoting liberality and progressive thought, have since extended their influence into public, moral, and ethical conduct. They claim to liberate people from outdated, inhibitive rules, targeting symbols like the Ten Commandments for removal from public spaces such as courthouses and schools, often with success. These groups have also leveraged public media to spread misleading information, gaining support for causes like abortion, which is presented as liberty but equates to the legalized murder of the unborn. This act, breaking the chains of marriage and child-rearing responsibilities, is tied by atheistic humanists to outdated biblical beliefs. Additionally, movements advocating for lesbianism and gay lifestyles have sought public acceptance, often reacting viciously against those who resist their version of liberty, causing suffering to dissenters. Lying, another form of immorality, is widely recognized among the public, yet many remain indifferent to it, even when it concerns national leadership. This apathy reflects a broader ignorance of biblical teachings on immorality and its national impact. Many attend church out of habit or for social reasons, without truly studying or living by the Bible's teachings. This lack of engagement extends to the majority of Americans, including leaders, lawmakers, and judges, resulting in a systematic loss of knowledge about God and His teachings. Consequently, immoral influences prevail in courts, which are now biased toward humanist liberties, leaving the innocent to suffer while the guilty escape penalties.

The Supreme Court's ruling on abortion was not a moral decision but a legal one, based on constitutional law. The morality of the nation remains untouched by this decision. Those whose immorality pushed for abortion continue to advocate for it, perhaps with even greater intensity and possibly more violence. God's judgment still hangs over the nation because, despite the change in federal ruling, the hearts of many people remain unchanged. Half of the citizens still believe it is acceptable to terminate pregnancies. While the law has shifted authority back to the states, the underlying moral conflict persists, and the war over this issue continues.