Paul, as depicted in the narrative, consistently upheld the law, contrary to misconceptions that he rejected it. He did not teach against circumcision or the laws of Moses, as some falsely claimed. When faced with such accusations in Jerusalem, Paul did not dismiss the law as obsolete but willingly followed James' suggestion to demonstrate his adherence, showing he was not against God's laws. His actions with Timothy further illustrate this, as he had Timothy circumcised as a concession to the Jews, not viewing circumcision as a curse but as a practical consideration for cultural harmony. This act was not a commitment to the entirety of the Old Covenant law but a strategic decision for the sake of Timothy and the Jewish community. Paul's approach reveals a nuanced understanding, balancing theological truths with practical ramifications, indicating he did not consider everything done away. His willingness to circumcise in one context while stating it is not necessary in another shows his discernment and adherence to the spirit of God's law rather than a blanket rejection.

Paul, in his defense before Felix, the governor, boldly confessed his belief in all things written in the law and the prophets. This statement, made during his trial in AD 58 or 59, came after the books of Romans and Galatians were already written and circulated through the church. Despite these writings, which are often cited as evidence for the law being done away, Paul maintained his steadfast adherence to the law. His position stands in stark contrast to modern views, affirming that he upheld the authority of God's law as revealed in the Old Testament. When discussing sanctification, which pertains to right living and character building, Paul emphasized the value and necessity of keeping the law. He asserted that it must be observed, highlighting its importance in guiding conduct and discipline.

The apostle Paul consistently upheld the importance of God's law in his teachings. In I Corinthians 14, when addressing the conduct during church services, Paul appealed to the law as his authority, demonstrating its relevance to the New Testament church. Similarly, in I Corinthians 9, regarding the remuneration of the ministry, he again grounded his argument in the law, showing that it was written with broader applications in mind, not just for immediate, historical contexts. Far from suggesting that the law was done away, Paul emphasized its enduring role in guiding Christian life and order. Moreover, in Romans 2, Paul clarified that both those ignorant of God's law and those with knowledge of it will be judged by the same standard, as the law defines sin. He underscored that possessing knowledge of the law does not save, but it does place one under stricter judgment, highlighting the responsibility to live according to God's standards. Through these teachings, Paul affirmed that the law remains a vital path for Christians, shaping conduct and preparing them for God's Kingdom.